Structure, Jurisdiction, and Powers of the Indian Judiciary

  • Structure of the Judiciary:
    • Single Integrated Judicial System: The Indian Constitution provides for a single integrated judicial system, unlike some other federal countries with separate State courts.
    • Pyramidal Structure: The judiciary is structured like a pyramid: Supreme Court at the top, High Courts below, and District and Subordinate Courts at the lowest level. Lower courts function under the direct superintendence of higher courts.
    • Supreme Court of India:
      • Decisions are binding on all other courts.
      • Can transfer High Court Judges.
      • Can move cases from any court to itself.
      • Can transfer cases from one High Court to another.
      • Is one of the very powerful courts globally.
      • Functions within constitutional limitations.
      • Functions and responsibilities defined by the Constitution.
      • Has specific jurisdiction or scope of powers.
    • High Court:
      • Can hear appeals from lower courts.
      • Can issue writs for restoring Fundamental Rights.
      • Can deal with cases within the State’s jurisdiction.
      • Exercises superintendence and control over courts below it.
      • Also has appellate jurisdiction over lower courts.
    • District Court:
      • Deals with cases arising in the District.
      • Considers appeals on decisions from lower courts.
      • Decides cases involving serious criminal offenses.
    • Subordinate Courts:
      • Consider cases of civil and criminal nature.
  • Jurisdiction of the Supreme Court:
    • Original Jurisdiction:
      • Cases directly considered by the Supreme Court without prior lower court proceedings.
      • Settles disputes involving federal relations, specifically between the Union and States, and among States.
      • Acts as an umpire in federal disputes.
      • Supreme Court alone has this power; neither High Courts nor lower courts can deal with such cases.
      • Interprets powers of Union and State governments as per the Constitution.
    • Writ Jurisdiction:
      • Any individual whose fundamental right is violated can directly approach the Supreme Court for remedy.
      • The Supreme Court can issue special orders in the form of writs (Habeas Corpus, Mandamus, Prohibition, Certiorari, Quo Warranto) to protect fundamental rights.
      • High Courts can also issue writs. Individuals have the choice to approach either the High Court or Supreme Court directly.
      • Writs allow the Court to order the executive to act or refrain from acting in a particular way.
    • Appellate Jurisdiction:
      • The Supreme Court is the highest court of appeal.
      • Appeals against High Court decisions can be made if the High Court certifies the case involves a serious interpretation of law or the Constitution.
      • In criminal cases, if a lower court sentences a person to death, an appeal can be made to the High Court or Supreme Court.
      • The Supreme Court has the power to admit appeals even if the High Court does not allow it.
      • Appellate jurisdiction means the Supreme Court reconsiders the case and legal issues, changing rulings and providing new interpretations if lower courts misunderstood the law/Constitution.
    • Advisory Jurisdiction:
      • The President of India can refer matters of public importance or constitutional interpretation to the Supreme Court for advice.
      • The Supreme Court is not bound to give advice, and the President is not bound to accept it.
      • Utility: Allows the government to seek legal opinion before acting, potentially preventing litigations. Government can make suitable changes to actions/legislations based on advice.
    • Special Powers: Can grant special leave to appeal from any judgment or matter passed by any court in India’s territory.
  • Unified Nature of Judiciary and Supreme Court Powers:
    • Binding Decisions: Decisions of the Supreme Court are binding on all other courts in India.
    • Enforceable Orders: Orders passed by it are enforceable nationwide.
    • Review of Own Decisions (Article 137): The Supreme Court is not bound by its own decisions and can review them at any time.
    • Contempt of Court: The Supreme Court itself decides cases of contempt against it.
    • Aid by Authorities (Article 144): All civil and judicial authorities in India must act in aid of the Supreme Court.

This MCQ module is based on: Structure, Jurisdiction, and Powers of the Indian Judiciary

This assessment will be based on: Structure, Jurisdiction, and Powers of the Indian Judiciary

  • Real-Life Connections & General Knowledge:
    • The integrated judicial system is a distinguishing feature of India’s federal structure, promoting uniformity in law interpretation and application across states, unlike some other federal systems.
    • The “writ jurisdiction” is a powerful tool for safeguarding Fundamental Rights, making the Supreme Court and High Courts accessible to citizens whose rights are violated, a unique feature in many constitutions.
    • The advisory jurisdiction of the Supreme Court demonstrates its role as a constitutional interpreter and guide for the executive, preventing potential legal pitfalls in governance.
  • Case-based Scenarios & Reasoning:
    • Scenario: The Union Government and a State Government are in a legal dispute over the interpretation of a specific provision in the Constitution regarding revenue sharing.
      • Question: Which jurisdiction of the Supreme Court would be invoked in this case, and why? Explain the Supreme Court’s role as an “umpire” in such federal matters.
    • Scenario: A lower court sentences a person to life imprisonment in a criminal case. The convicted person believes there were significant errors in the legal process.
      • Question: Describe the path an appeal would take through the Indian judicial hierarchy, explaining the role of the High Court and the Supreme Court’s appellate jurisdiction in such a case.
  • Conceptual Application:
    • Explain how the pyramidal structure of the Indian judiciary, with the Supreme Court at its apex, ensures a unified system of justice delivery and hierarchy of judicial authority.
    • Discuss the strategic utility of the Supreme Court’s power to review its own judgments (Article 137), considering potential scenarios where such a power would be essential for justice or constitutional evolution.
  • Numerical/Data Interpretation:
    • Diagram of Judicial Structure: The diagram visually represents the hierarchy, which is crucial for understanding the flow of cases and appeals.
    • Articles (137, 144): These constitutional articles provide the legal basis for significant powers, indicating specific numerical references for legal provisions.
  • Comparative & Analytical Points:
    • Compare and contrast the powers of the Supreme Court, High Courts, District Courts, and Subordinate Courts within the integrated judicial system, highlighting their distinct roles and interdependencies.
    • Analyze the “optional” nature of the Supreme Court’s advisory role and the President’s acceptance of it. Discuss the benefits of having such a non-binding advisory function for good governance.
Previous Topic
Back to Lesson
Next Topic